The Math is an ancient
science and humanity is dealing with it for ages (so long that he could not say
exactly how long). The Greeks in the V century BC bring proof of the main (and
only) acceptable method to reach new knowledge. By that time it was used mainly
measurement approach. The Greeks developed math not because of its application,
and for its sake. The knowing of math was a sign of high culture and social
status.
In the early ages the math has developed
mainly in the philosophical schools (equivalent to modern universities) of the
famous philosophers of that time (mathematics) - Pythagoras, Plato, Aristotle,
Euclid and others. After separation of the philosophy of math comes from the
line of reasoning as the main culprit of what is considered Aristotle. The Aristotelian
logic is known now as syllogistic logic. It has been doing work in the conduct
of scientific disputes, but was woefully inadequate for proving mathematical
theorems. Aristotle classifies the claims of several groups and says what
judgments (between statements from different groups) are correct. Contribution
to mathematics is Euclid, who introduced more general logic that works and
mathematicians.
At the end of the 19th century the math was
divided into several parts - algebra, analysis, geometry, etc. Mathematicians
began to question what really is the thing these shares. Cantor has undertaken
this difficult task and thus laid the foundation of set theory. Unfortunately,
the initial version of the theory was wrong - Cantor himself discovered a
contradiction in cardinal numbers (reflecting infinity). Philosopher Russell
also discovered just contradiction. Russell's theory by offering numerous to be
considered at levels as elements from one level can participate in many of the
upper level. The math automatically 'builds' on set theory without the need of
reformulation of definitions / theorems, etc. Development of mathematics
continues to Hilbert, who has several problems of the mathematical community.
One of them is the construction of complete and unequivocal mathematical
theory. A theory is complete if every claim can be proved by it that is either
true or false. Unequivocal means that one cannot claim to prove that it is both
true and false (that we saw in Russell's paradox). Consistency of the theory
can be demonstrated by creating a pattern in its other theory, which has been
shown that it is non-contradictory. In the end, it all boils down to the theory
of natural numbers (arithmetic - addition, multiplication) so its consistency
is demonstrated all can relax. Logic has developed quite early 20th century
just to try to prove the consistency (and possibly completeness) of arithmetic.
The
mathematicians soon calmed down and resigned to the fact that they cannot prove
the consistency of maths. Over time, the question arises whether the machine to
prove the facts of a given system and verify their faithfulness or
unfaithfulness. After clarification of the concept of an algorithm is proved
that assertion of maths cannot be ascertained whether it is right or wrong, but
for geometrical proposition possible. The math has developed dynamically
through proven geniuses, so now we can learn from their discoveries, and why
not to proceed them.
No comments:
Post a Comment